Adverse Selection in Insurance ► This case occurs when the insurer conceals a vital parameter in the insurance, that puts the insurer at loss. Thus, the insurance premium is lesser, since the insurer has not factored the risk while calculating the risk potential, due to asymmetric information. As such, the insurance will be less profitable for the insurer, since he is not aware of a critical information that might increase the chances of the insured event happening. ► How adverse selection affects the health insurance market: This sector is most prone to adverse selection. Typically, those who are at a higher risk to health hazards will find it beneficial to buy an insurance coverage, than a healthy person who is at much lower risk. Those who are healthy will find the premiums too high to pay, hence, they will avoid taking an insurance cover. Also, the insured might hide vital data that might threaten his health or life, and choose not to disclose the information to the insurer. For example, a smoker is at more risk to health hazards, and hence, he will tend to buy an insurance policy to mitigate the risk, than a non-smoker. That means, even non-smokers have to pay high premium, hence, that dissuades them from buying the insurance policy. This is a huge loss to the insurance company. Sometimes, the insurance company might not be able to distinguish between high-risk and low-risk investors, due to which, it might be difficult for them to compute the insurance premium. ► To curb such a situation, the insurance company might make different plans, and accordingly, the potential insurance investors will choose from the plans. Of course, those who wish for a higher recovery amount will go for a plan, even if it has a high premium, and those with lesser requirements will go for a plan that has lesser insurance premium, though it implies lesser insurance coverage. ► The other alternative for the insurance company can be to incur costs in making a background check and collecting information about potential insurance investors, thereby making it easy to factor the risk areas, if any.

Financial Market ► The stock market is subject to a lot of speculation, and there are high chances that buyers make losses due to adverse selection. Adverse selection will occur due to the difference in knowledge of the informed and the uninformed traders, respectively. Those who are better informed will make more trading benefits than the less-informed.

Lending ► If a lender does not do a proper verification of the financial position of a firm to which it is lending money, and accordingly, does not charge higher interest rates to high-risk borrowers, it will lead to adverse selection. To mitigate risk, if the lender increases the interest rates, the good parties who cannot afford high interest rates will automatically be driven out.

Adverse selection, if unchecked, can create a lot of financial problems. Following are the risks associated with it. With lesser investments due to adverse selection, firms may suffer, as without investments, there will be lesser capital for expansion and development activities. If high-risk investors are more, insurance company's revenue will decrease considerably. Asymmetric information may lead to a lot of financial losses. For example, if you buy a used car which does not give performance as much as what is expected, your investment in that car is not getting optimum returns. In case of the banking sector, if a bank lends to a high risk borrower, unknowingly, without charging appropriate interest, and failing in party scrutiny beforehand, there are chances that he will default in the payment. Of course, a bank has other risk mitigation options, such as, they can sell the mortgaged property, etc. However, it is very important that the bank exercises due diligence before lending money. Adverse selection is one of the reasons for market failure. In this case, even the good brands suffer due to the presence of bad products, since the buyer or the seller cannot distinguish between the two.

In this paper, George A. Akerlof gave a simple example to understand the impact of asymmetric information and adverse selection on the market. 'Lemon' is an informal word to describe a car that has turned out to be a defective piece after buying it, whereas, 'good car' refers to a well-maintained car. In the market of used cars, both, the lemons and good cars are pooled together, and it is not easy for any buyer to distinguish between them. This leads to asymmetric information, since the sellers have more knowledge of the car than the buyers. That is the reason that the buyers are skeptical before buying the car, and know there is a possibility that the car may turn out to be a lemon. Hence, buyers reduce their reservation prices, which discourages the owners of the good cars. They are driven out of the market, and hence, essentially, only the lemons remain in the market. Instead, the lemons get a higher price than what they deserve. Thus, this asymmetric information leads to adverse selection by the consumers.